Jonathanstewart75's blog

Eminem Drops Official Video for "The Monster" Featuring Rihanna! Watch Here!

Days after giving fans a sneak peek, Eminem debuted the official music video for "The Monster" on Monday (December 16).

Adding her talents to the explicit video, Rihanna poses as the rappers therapist.

For his part, Eminem portrays a mental patient who is reliving his past via televison.

Check out the video in the player below. THIS VIDEO MAY NOT BE SUITABLE FOR ALL AUDIENCES!

Source: http://celebrity-gossip.net/eminem/eminem-drops-official-video-monster-featuring-rihanna-watch-here-990805
Similar Articles: ipad mini   Humble Bundle   Kerry Washington   tom hanks   Michelle Rodriguez  

China's Rover Has Reportedly Landed On the Moon

China's state-run television network is reporting that the unmanned Yutu lunar rover has successfully soft-landed on the moon. The rover, which touched down a few minutes after 9PM Saturday night Beijing time, is the first object to be successfully soft-landed on the moon since 1976.

Read more...

Source: http://feeds.gawker.com/~r/gizmodo/full/~3/xo_3DMsZBsU/chinas-rover-has-reportedly-landed-on-the-moon-1483252000
Tags: Jabari Parker   veteran   billy graham   Cam McDaniel   steve bartman  

Aldi selling £80 Android tablet this weekend

Supermarket chain Aldi is the latest UK retail name to start selling super-cheap Android tablets in the run up to the holidays. This Sunday, Dec. 8, the store will offer the Medion LifeTab E7316 tablet for £79.99. It's an Android 4.2.2 Jelly Bean slate with a quad-core 1.6GHz CPU, 1GB of RAM and 8GB internal flash, expandable via microSD card. You also get front and rear cameras — 2MP and 0.3MP units — as well as 802.11n Wifi connectivity.

The specs are nothing spectacular compared to the likes of the Nexus 7. But this thing sells for less than half the price of Google's tablet, and on the face of it seems decent value for money. There is however no indication as to whether the tablet is Google Play certified — a process which has presented issues for some cut-price tablets in the recent past.

In any case, before parting with your cash, it's worth remembering that not every cheap Android tablet is worth buying.

Source: Aldi; via: Eurodroid

Source: http://feedproxy.google.com/~r/androidcentral/~3/XCooHJkuwvc/story01.htm
Similar Articles: toys r us   walking dead   kindle fire   Macklemore   miami dolphins  

All Around My Hat: Steeleye Span

"All Around My Hat" is a rework of a 19th century song about staying true to your fiancee while she is sent to serve seven years for theft in the penal colony in Australia. Probably just what you thought. Anyway, Steeleye Span heard something in it and turned it into a chart topper, at least in Ireland where it was #3 for awhile in 1975. It's catchy and pretty hilarious and I used to dance around to it in my formative years so there you go.

Read more...

Source: http://feeds.gawker.com/~r/gizmodo/full/~3/AU8yjDuBfnM/all-around-my-hat-steeleye-span-1474618270
Tags: Dwayne Bowe   miami heat   pittsburgh steelers   Windows 8.1   arcade fire  

Amazon brings Instant Video to Japan, offers over 26,000 movies and TV shows

Folks in the Land of the Rising Sun will be pleased to know that there's now another option where they can rent or buy movies and TV shows. Today, Amazon announced the arrival of its Instant Video service in Japan, bringing with it a selection of more than 26,000 series and films from local and international studios -- such as Shochiku, Toho, TV Asahi, TBS and Warner Bros., to mention a few. Of course, this means viewers will have access to Amazon Instant Video on a number of different platforms, including PCs and the company's Kindle Fire line of tablets. So what are you waiting for? Start building out your very own Watchlist right about now -- and we'd definitely recommend placing Pacific Rim in there.

 Comments Share

Source: http://feeds.engadget.com/~r/weblogsinc/engadget/~3/aLClBGpp5Is/
Tags: Dwayne Bowe   Blue Is the Warmest Color   vikings   once upon a time   iOS 7  

Now Available: Lumia 1520, Lumia 2520 . . . Oh Yeah, and Xbox One

A few new gadgets hit the shelves this week. Two of them are glossy and colorful, and one of them is black and came with tons of hype. You know which one we're talking about.

Read more...

Source: http://feeds.gawker.com/~r/gizmodo/full/~3/xJPUDu4CaNI/now-available-lumia-1520-lumia-2520-oh-yeah-an-1470003085
Similar Articles: thanksgiving   Washington Il   Maleficent   Blue Is the Warmest Color   Kendrick Lamar  

Coin wants to combine all of your cards into one, but how well will it work?

The Internet has been buzzing about Coin, a credit card replacement announced last Thursday. Currently taking pre-orders, and planning to launch Summer 2014, Coin is a credit card-sized device which is capable of storing and behaving as pretty much any card with a magnetic strip: credit cards, gift cards, membership cards, etc. Coin allows you to select which card you want to use, and when you or a merchant swipe your credit card, the information for the appropriate card can be read from Coin. Replacing every card in your wallet with a single, card-sized device is exciting to think about, but obviously a product like this raises a lot of questions.

How secure is coin?

When you're putting a considerable amount of your payment information into a device, you want to know how well your information will be protected. Coin has answered many questions in their FAQ including several about security, but they leave some questions unanswered.

Coin states that their servers, mobile apps, and card use "128-bit or 256-bit encryption for all storage and communication (http and bluetooth)." This sounds nice, but doesn't mean a whole lot. The effectiveness of encryption depends greatly on its implementation. It doesn't matter how strong your encryption is if your implementation is flawed – a locked gate isn't very secure if somebody can easily climb over or walk around it. This is not to say that I think Coin's implementation is flawed – I have absolutely no clue what their implementation looks like because they haven't shared those details – I only mean to point out that Coin's answer doesn't tell us much.

How much does this matter? Not as much as you might think. It would certainly be preferable to see Coin use a rock-solid, peer-reviewed, highly-secure implementation, but it's important to remember that credit cards are pretty insecure to begin with. Not only are credit cards not encrypted, nearly all of the information necessary to make a clone of your credit card is printed visibly on the card itself. Even if Coin totally botches the encryption (and I'm not trying to imply in any way that I think they will), if a criminal acquired a Coin with several of your credit cards on it, and for some reason you didn't have it set to deactivate (a security feature offered by Coin when your card is away from your phone for too long), they would be in possession of the same payment information as if you had lost your wallet with several of your credit cards in it. Coin does offer several security advantages over actual credit cards (alerting you when you leave your card behind and automatic deactivation), but even if those fail, the information you stand to lose is the same. In fact, considerably less information is available from the physical appearance of Coin than the information printed on your credit cards.

The only possibility I see for greater exposure to fraud with Coin would be a scenario where a merchant has the ability to swipe your Coin outside of your presence, such as at a restaurant when a waiter or waitress takes your card. If they were taking cards in the back to run through a skimmer in order to grab all of your credit card info for fraud later, with a Coin they could copy the information for all cards on your Coin, whereas using a normal credit card they would only have access to a single card's information. This sort of fraud does happen, albeit to a relatively small percentage of card holders, so people will have to evaluate for themselves how much of a concern this specific type of scenario is. In cases like this, consumers in the are usually covered by fraud protection which only leaves them responsible for a maximum of $50 per card, and in some cases, none at all.

What's the fraud liability with coin?

This raises an interesting question: who is responsible for fraud committed when Coin is involved? U.S. consumers are protected from credit card fraud by the Fair Credit Billing Act (FCBA). According to the FTC, consumer liability for a stolen credit card is limited to $50 per card. If somebody uses your credit card number for fraud, but the card was never lost or stolen, you're not liable for any unauthorized use. This is noteworthy because it's unclear how Coin will be seen in the eyes of merchants, credit card companies, and the law. If you lost your wallet, you could be on the hook for $50 for every stolen card used for fraud. If you lost your Coin... well you never technically lost the actual card, so the argument could be made that you shouldn't be liable for anything. But this is where things get a little hazy, is Coin a credit card or not?

While consumer liability for fraud is limited, somebody has to pay when fraud is committed. The brunt of this responsibility falls on the merchant who processed the fraudulent purchase and the financial institution who issued the credit card. Merchants who process credit cards have merchant agreements with credit card companies that establish rules and guidelines between the two parties. The specifics will vary between merchants and financial institutions, but generally speaking if a merchant follows guidelines set forth in their agreement for taking payment, their liability for any chargebacks made as a result of fraud will be limited. However, if the merchant does not follow the guidelines and does not perform their due-diligence to ensure a purchase is not fraudulent, they may be the one liable for fraud.

Some of the most fundamental mechanisms for fraud prevention are the security features present on all credit cards. All credit cards include visible features to help verify the authenticity of a card such as the credit card company's logo, holograms, embossed security characters, and tamper-evident signature panels. Merchants have to be cautious about accepting suspicious looking cards because if they do, they could be held liable if it's a fraudulent purchase. While a Coin card may hold the credit card information necessary to make a purchase, it looks nothing like existing credit cards that merchants have been trained to accept. It doesn't include security features that all major credit cards companies specifically instruct their merchants to verify. Discover even offers a handy reference to help merchants identify valid cards. Many merchants may have no problem accepting Coin, but they also have no obligation to and may not for fear of being held liable for fraud.

Unanswered questions about coin

We have a few more questions that we're waiting to hear back from Coin on that seem worth mentioning here. We previously discussed the security of the Coin card itself and how it stacks up to losing a wallet, but what about information stored on Coin servers? The Coin FAQ states that your Coin is tied to your account, not your specific device. This means if you ever lose your phone, you can simply pair your Coin with a new phone using their app. Since the Coin card loads your credit card information from the app, this means syncing to a new phone would either require you to re-enter all of your cards and re-sync data to your Coin, or your Coin account holds all of your credit card information and can sync to the app once you sign in. The latter is obviously the more convenient route, but would require Coin to store all of your credit card information on their servers. We have yet to get confirmation that this is the case, but if it is, it obviously poses some security concerns. You're not just trusting Coin to securely store your credit card information on your Coin card and in their app, but on their servers. That's entrusting a lot of financial information into a single location in the cloud. And we're not just talking credit card numbers, but full track data. It's everything necessary to create an exact copy of your credit cards.

For their part, Coin has stated in their FAQ that they are currently in the process of getting PCI DSS (Payment Card Industry Data Security Standard) certified. PCI DSS is a payment industry standard for any organizations that handle cardholder information. PCI DSS is good in that it establishes a security baseline for organizations to follow who will be processing credit card information. It's bad in that it's pretty much limited to what most would consider common sense. PCI DSS requirements offer sage advice such as "Do not use vendor-supplied defaults for system passwords and other security parameters" and "Use and regularly update anti-virus software on all systems commonly affected by malware". The effectiveness of PCI DSS is certainly up for debate, but there's no harm in Coin getting certified – it at least shows a desire to meet industry standards.

That said, it's unclear if Coin will be able to obtain PCI DSS certification. One of the pieces of information that Coin stores for each card is the CVV. The CVV is the three-digit number on the back of the card and is usually required for "card not present" purchases, like online shopping or placing an order over the phone. The purpose of CVV is to prove that the consumer is in possession of the actual credit card. In order to ensure its effectiveness, PCI DSS requires that no organization that stores, processes, or transmits credit card information saves the CVV (or full track data for that matter). Coin doesn't (and can't, in order for its product to work) meet these requirements. However, PCI DSS does offer exemptions for "issuers and companies that support issuing services" if there is a business justification and the data is stored securely. Once again Coin falls into a big of a gray area. They're not a card issuer, but do they qualify as a company that supports an issuer? We've reached out to Coin asking about these requirements and look forward to getting clarification from them – we'll update this post when we do.

Can coin gain acceptance?

Technical questions aside, Coin has generated a lot of buzz, and the real question is: does it have what it takes to gain the traction needed to stick around? Square has been wildly successful at shaking up the payment industry, but there are two key differences between Square's approach and Coin's. First of all, Square established relationships with major credit card companies before rolling out. Square's situation was a little different than Coin's because Coin won't actually be processing payments, but being backed by credit card companies gave Square immediate trustworthiness with merchants and consumers. Square also targeted merchants first. Offering benefits over traditional card processing companies meant merchants had incentive to use Square. For many merchants, Square meant being able to accept credit cards for the first time. Consumers were on board because it meant being able to pay with credit cards in more places, and it had no negative impact on their ability to pay. Coin is targeting consumers first. In fact, Coin's CEO told CNN Money that they have no intention to talk with merchants:

"We don't plan to go out of our way to educate the merchant world about it, because we're focused on the consumer side, and anyone who works on the merchant side is also a consumer anyway."

Of course, in many cases merchants won't have a say. Anywhere that a customer can swipe their own card, merchant concerns essentially become a non-issue. Though Coin users may want to carry a backup card for any instances where a non-compliant cashier is the one who has to swipe.

In the long run, Coin would stand to benefit by getting merchants to recognize and willingly accept Coin. Credit card companies will need to openly support the product with clear policies for consumers and businesses. Once card companies state that merchants accepting Coin cards won't be liable for fraud, merchants will need to be educated on accepting Coin. Having a single Coin card to store all of my credit cards offers some convenience, but not nearly as much convenience as handing over a credit card to pay without having to explain my latest gadget to the cashier, or wait for the establishment to call the credit card company for authorization. Some credit card companies even have policies stating that if a merchant suspects a card to be fraudulent, they should keep it if possible. Tech-savvy gadget-lovers are intrigued by the idea of Coin, but some merchants might just be left confused as hell.

Coin isn't set to be available until Summer 2014, which gives them a lot of time to iron out any wrinkles and talk with credit card companies if they so desire. Should card companies choose to stay silent, it would likely have a minimal impact on Coin. Consumers have already shown a great deal of interest, with Coin hitting its $50,000 fundraising goal in only 40 minutes. The backing of a major credit card company could be what takes Coin from a niche product to gaining widespread public adoption – regardless, consumers are already showing significant interest.

• Pre-order Coin $50

Source: http://feedproxy.google.com/~r/TheIphoneBlog/~3/QSNC7a9QaeE/story01.htm
Related Topics: apple   Pretty Little Liars   columbus day   Arsenio Hall   tracy mcgrady  

Alcatel-Lucent says focus on fast broadband, IP is key to comeback

With its new-found focus on IP networking and fast broadband access, Alcatel-Lucent is poised to take advantage of a worldwide explosion in mobile devices and the rush of service providers and operators to the cloud, company executives said at the networking vendor's tech symposium this week.

At the conference, ending Friday, Alcatel-Lucent executives fleshed out for analysts and media the strategy behind the "Shift" plan to morph the company from a general supplier of telecom equipment into what it has called an "industrial specialist."

Much is at stake for the financially stressed company. The plan, announced in June, calls for the company to shed US$1 billion in assets and become profitable by 2015. In October, the company announced that as part of the plan it would cut 15,000 workers and create 5,000 positions as it executes the strategy.

"We are all at a turning point in the industry," said CEO Michel Combes Thursday at the symposium, held in Basking Ridge, New Jersey, a few minutes drive from the headquarters of Lucent before it merged with Alcatel in 2006. "What was working five years ago for service providers doesn't work anymore."

Alcatel-Lucent customers are struggling to keep up with a number of trends, Combes said. Users may end up having 10 or more devices, which will result in increasing demand for ultra-broadband access to the cloud and high-speed core IP networking technology, he said. "Ultra broadband" is a blanket term Alcatel-Lucent uses to mean fast wireless or wireline connectivity.

Network operator and service provider capital expenditures will likely increase as cloud services scale up to billions of instances, Combes noted. This scenario also calls for operators and service providers to quickly provision new users and services.

In addition, enterprises, facing these same trends, also will have to invest in industrial-strength networking equipment, Combes said.

"Network and cloud infrastructures are intersecting," Combes said, leading to "carrier-like routing within the data center."

All these trends will require networking equipment and software makers to support cloud technology.

"The cloud shift now really defines our future," Combes said. "We have selected one direction to evolve Alcatel-Lucent and we are placing IP -- our growth engine for the last 10 years -- at the center of the company."

While the Shift plan focuses Alcatel-Lucent resources on key trends, it may take a while to judge whether it is successful, analysts said.

"The plan leverages Alcatel-Lucent's strengths," said Glen Hunt, an analyst with Current Analysis. "We have to see how they execute; we have to see some proof points, how they do with customers."

It's still early days for some of Alcatel-Lucent's ventures. Nuage Networks, an Alcatel-Lucent internal startup in Santa Clara, California, for developing an SDN (software-defined networking) platform called VSP (Virtualized Services Platform), was launched in April.

There is a big opportunity for SDN in data centers, said Basil Alwan, president of Alcatel-Lucent's IP Routing and Transport business. "Most data centers still run basic switching in their network," and new users have to be provisioned manually, Alwan said.

"The real power of SDN is how simple we make it to provision," Alwan said, in an interview. "We've sucked all the complexity out of the networking devices and put it into software," he said.

The VSP can work with routers and switches from any vendor, providing an alternative to Cisco Systems, which is likely to try to sell data centers on an entire range of products, Alwan noted.

"We have a real chance to challenge Cisco in the service provider market," Combes stressed.

Nuage has started to take purchase orders for the platform from both service providers and enterprises. Meanwhile, Alcatel-Lucent has had a string of successes with its LTE technology.

"Carriers are moving to ultra-broadband to gain competitive advantage," said David Geary, president of Alcatel-Lucent's wireless business. "There is a huge market-share benefit to being first mover."

During the tech symposium, Alcatel-Lucent announced that its all-IP EPC (Evolved Packet Core) portfolio has been selected to support the nationwide rollout of China Mobile's LTE network, set to be the world's largest mobile ultra-broadband network. China Mobile awarded Alcatel-Lucent 24 percent of its overall EPC network, making Alcatel-Lucent the primary EPC supplier for the entire LTE network.

In addition to offerings for macro networks, Alcatel-Lucent sees opportunities for its small cell product line. The company's small cell products extend coverage and capacity to hotspots and indoor locations, offering operators a cost-effective alternative to take some load off macro networks and quickly meet growing coverage and capacity demands, Alcatel-Lucent's Geary said.

Fixed broadband access network technology also falls within the scope of the Shift plan. While fixed networks were considered a low-growth market, Combes noted, VDSL2 vectoring, which boosts the bandwidth possible over telephony networks, is a strong business for the company.

Combes touched on some of the company's mistakes: "We missed Optical TDM and more importantly we missed W-CDMA."

Now, Combes said, "the ticket to win for us is the execution of the Shift plan."

Subscribe to the Business Brief Newsletter

Thank you for sharing this page.

Sorry! There was an error emailing this page

Source: http://www.pcworld.com/article/2064041/alcatellucent-says-focus-on-fast-broadband-ip-is-key-to-comeback.html#tk.rss_all
Category: Jimmy Graham   Pope Francis   Chobani Recall   nytimes   Blurred Lines Lyrics  

Geeking out young: gadgets and coding need to be core in US schools

Remember readin', 'riting, and 'rithmatic? According to our Rethinking Education panelists, the three 'R's need to be joined by a 'C' -- for computer science -- or the US risks getting run over by more progressive nations. That was the opinion of Rodrigo Arboleda from the One Laptop Per Child organization, who spoke at Engadget Expand along with Jeff Branson from Sparkfun and Pat Yongpradit from Code.org.

Pat kicked off the discussion by playing his organization's YouTube video featuring the likes of Bill Gates and Mark Zuckerberg, which has been seen by some 10 million viewers. While motivational, it emphasized that only one in ten American schools teach students how to code, a deficit that all three speakers found scandalous. Arboleda chalked it up to an educational system that still processes students like a factory that doesn't take individual student's ability to learn into account. He added that more progressive countries like South Korea, Taiwan and Finland might soon be pumping out more computer scientists and engineers thanks to a strong emphasis on coding.

One of the strongest challenges is that computer sciences get a bad rap, associated as they are with a rigid male culture of uncreative learning. Prodded further by moderator Dana Wollman, Jeff said that we could start by creating new systems and interfaces that eliminate gender bias, citing first person shooter-type games as a prime offender. As far as being a rote discipline, Pat argued that coding actually teaches creativity, problem solving and a host of other life skills. By way of debunking the myth that programming is only for nerds, he showed a picture of his latest Code.org class -- which featured as many jocks as geeks and more female than male students. As for geek culture now being cool, Jeff added that Sparkfun has to try less hard to attract students now, thanks to a new cachet for coding, robotics and the like.

Though many feel that there's already too many gadgets and too much internet in kids' lives, Rodrigo and One Laptop per Child have the opposite viewpoint. He said that a laptop can become a precious, transformational object for a child, taking them to new places in their personal development -- especially if coupled with internet access. As for the sorry state of computer science in schools stateside, Yongpradit emphasized the need for teacher certification programs in computing, building a curriculum the same way math and sciences were: one block at a time. Rodrigo took it a step further, saying that access to digital tools and internet has become "a basic human right" -- severely disadvantaging those who lack them.

Source: http://www.engadget.com/2013/11/11/geeking-out-young-rethinking-education/?ncid=rss_truncated
Similar Articles: Kenichi Ebina   Justin Morneau   new york times   Nsync Vma   Jana Lutteropp  

Orange backs off 2013 plan for Tizen smartphones

Getting smartphone operating Tizen off the ground has proven more difficult than its backers first thought. Operator Orange no longer wants to predict when the first phones will arrive, and Samsung Electronics is also mum on its progress.

In February, the Tizen OS was demonstrated at Mobile World Congress, and executives from backers Samsung, Intel, NTT DoCoMo and Orange were out in full force. The Tizen project was born more than two years ago, when the Linux Foundation and Limo Foundation rebooted their efforts to compete with Apple and the Android camp by merging MeeGo and Limo. In addition to smartphones and tablets, it will be used on TVs and in-vehicle information and entertainment devices.

However, the MWC demo showed an OS that was still very much under development. Orange’s device boss Yves Maitre at the time deflected criticism by saying that Orange wasn’t in a hurry but it would ship the first smartphones based on Tizen during the second half of this year. At that point, that seemed like plenty of time, but in the end it wasn’t enough.

To launch phones based on Tizen before the end of the year no longer makes sense, according to Maitre. The underlying strategy needed work, even if that unfortunately meant the first products had to be postponed, he said.

“We are reassessing our strategy together with the Tizen community on how to go to market and what that means in terms of features, price points and market positioning,” Maitre said.

Orange got cold feet in part due to what Maitre said were lessons learned from the launch of the first devices based on Mozilla’s competing Firefox OS, which initially have struggled with performance issues. The minimum smartphone users want is something that can compete with entry-level Android phones, including Orange’s in-house products, according to Maitre.

For now, Maitre doesn’t want to say when he expects Orange to start selling Tizen-based smartphones, only that there are ongoing discussions at an executive level. But he reiterated that Orange is still intent on increasing competition among smartphone platforms by backing Windows Phone as well as Tizen.

Samsung also doesn’t want to say when the first phones based on the OS will arrive.

“Samsung has been actively working on the Tizen eco-system, together with Tizen Association members and partners. The first Tizen-based smartphone will be released in cooperation with mobile operators and eco-system partners. Samsung is committed to delivering the best mobile experience based on the open platform and a fully-ready eco-system around it,” a spokesman said via email.

NTT DoCoMo didn’t reply to questions regarding its plans for Tizen.

Tizen’s struggles once again underline how difficult it is to compete with Android and iOS. Google’s OS tightened its grip on the smartphone market and captured a record 81 percent share during the third quarter, according to Strategy Analytics.

“I think it will be very difficult for Samsung to position Tizen against Android, because Android has been such an astounding success. Why do you then need a second platform?” said Neil Mawston, executive director at Strategy Analytics.

The problems with getting Tizen ready are not a surprise: “There has been at least one point where it was supposed to be launched and wasn’t, possibly two, depending on who you listen to. But mobile software is notoriously difficult to develop,” Mawston said.

Another analyst agreed.

“Creating a new software platform from scratch is not an easy thing to do,” said Geoff Blaber, vice president of research for the Americas at CCS Insight. “There are a lot of pieces that need to be aligned in order to create products that are competitive versus what is now a very mature proposition with Android ... I think Samsung has also learned from Bada in particular that if you are going to launch a new OS you have to make sure its right from day one.”

Bada is a smartphone platform Samsung developed in-house. Its limited success is still haunting the company, according to Mawston.

“There will always be that nagging worry at the back of Samsung’s mind, I think, that it didn’t take off,” he said.

Getting the first phones out there is only the first challenge for the Tizen camp.

“Tizen’s biggest challenge in the smartphone space is its very close affiliations with Samsung. Other vendors will be very nervous about getting deeply committed to a software platform that firstly faces an uphill challenge to develop an ecosystem and second of all stands only to make their biggest competitor stronger,” Blaber said.

“I think there will be a Tizen portfolio at some point in 2014 or 2015,” Mawston said.

Subscribe to the Best of PCWorld Newsletter

Thank you for sharing this page.

Sorry! There was an error emailing this page

Source: http://www.pcworld.com/article/2062100/orange-backs-off-2013-plan-for-tizen-smartphones.html#tk.rss_all
Category: Bitstrips   Ken Norton   lamar odom   catherine zeta jones   Angel Dust